Weighing the Week Ahead: Are You Scared Yet?

If you find the current market action frightening, you are not alone. There is a bull market in disaster predictions, with a chorus of pundits predicting "another 2008." Sentiment indicators show increasing fear. Improvement in corporate earnings is seen as more evidence that something is wrong. After all, a market that cannot rally on good news is showing weakness.

The chart of the S&P 500 from the last year makes the case for a market that moved too far, too fast. Some see a new bearish leg -- not a correction but a major move to the old lows.

There is another perspective. Conditions are much different from the time of last March's low and also from the October, 2008, post Lehman period. A decline of ten percent or so after a big move is to be expected. Let us look at the S&P 500 with a two-year time frame.

The indicators in the two charts are the same, but the context is dramatically different. The fear from 2008 is ever with us. Patrick J. O'Hare, writing Briefing.com's regular feature, The Big Picture, summarizes it this way:

After the credit crisis of 2008/2009, which clearly presented a systemic risk few portfolios were positioned to deal with, there will be hyper-sensitivity to staying out in front of the next systemic risk.

To this point, consider for a moment how often the word "bubble" is tossed out to explain any uninterrupted rise in asset prices. Before the technology stock crash of 2000, the word "bubble" was rarely invoked in the marketplace, and when it was, it was typically used in association with an exposition on the South Sea Bubble of the early-18th century.

What there is today in the stock market is a bubble in the use of the word bubble.

That is a clever and accurate summary. He might have added that black swans are not found in herds.

Last Week's Action

Let's start with a look at the key data from last week. As usual, I am not trying to be comprehensive, nor am I taking a viewpoint. I will highlight what I found significant.

The Good

The earnings news is petering out for this season, but the general pattern of strength continues. Positive guidance is beating negative guidance by the widest margin in nearly a decade, according to Bespoke Investment Group. This is unusually good news, and eventually it will matter.

Some celebrated the weekly decline in initial claims. This reverses a couple of weeks of poor data. I disagree. The weekly series is just too noisy. Next week's data will be distorted by weather, as will next month's payroll employment data. (The payroll survey is done during the week including the 12th of the month).

The Bad.

The trade balance was a bit worse than expected and inventories a bit lower. The revisions will make the 4th quarter GDP increase lower. The revisions to the initial estimate of GDP come as we get more data. The news is not good, but neither is it some big conspiracy as some maintain.

Regular readers know that I find the University of Michigan sentiment indicator to be important and helpful. This month's reading was lower than expected, and certainly not at the bullish levels of the ISM. This is a helpful indicator for employment and job creation, so the report was bad news.

The bond auctions were weak, with long-term rates moving higher. The ten-year has moved to about 3.7% and corporate spreads have also widened. This is bad for stocks, since corporate bonds are a viable asset allocation alternative.

The news about Greece is certainly a negative. Regardless of the outcome, investors need to worry about the extent of sovereign debt problems in Europe and what it means for the U.S.

Briefly put, there was plenty of negative news.

The Ugly. Volatility! When the market makes major moves lower on little news, and seems dependent on Germany's attitude toward Greece ----- well, that is a problem.

Much of this translated into a stronger dollar. While I have demonstrated that a strong dollar is just fine for stocks in the long run, the current relationship is a strong negative correlation. The hot money sees a pattern like this and it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy -- at least until it quits working.

The Week Ahead

My focus for next week is on Wednesday. Building permits are a good leading indicator of construction activity. (These cost money and reflect actual plans). Industrial production is also important.

I do not find the "leading" indicators to be very helpful nor am I concerned about the PPI and CPI right now. I do not expect any surprises from the Fed minutes.

The European news and the dollar will continue to be important.

Our Trading Forecast

Our own indicators (see our regular ETF updates for an explanation) continue as bearish, and that was our vote in the weekly Ticker Sense Blogger Sentiment Poll. Here is what we see:

1) Only 13% (down from 67% two weeks ago) of our ETF's have positive ratings. This is extremely weak.

2) The median strength is -22 (down from -15 last week), very negative.

3) 87% (up from 35% two weeks ago) of the sectors are in the "penalty box," showing much higher risk than in recent weeks.

4) Our Index Package has a negative rating. We own SH and DOG, the inverse ETF's for the S&P 500 and the DJIA.

A Helpful Insight

This is a good time for investors to think about long-term needs and goals. There are some simple solutions for those who are afraid of a repeat of 2008.

I had some reader questions after last week's update, wondering whether asset allocation models had triggered. Mine have not. The "correction" is still relatively small when compared to the recent gains.

We watch the asset allocation carefully for clients, and the indicators are closer to a conservative stance, but not there yet and certainly not short.

The average investor can try to do this at home. There are plenty of ideas online. You need to find a good method, continually update your indicators, avoid emotion, and execute the trades in a timely fashion. Few investors can do this, even when trying to follow a "lazy" portfolio. That is one reason why they trail the market by 4 percent a year while top advisors beat the market by solid margins.

Unless you are exceptional on these fronts, you might look for a good financial advisor. If you do, insist on someone who has personal service -- who understands your specific needs, risk tolerance and requirements. If the fees were low enough, and the stock picks were good enough, this would be better than you could do on your own. Over many years, it might be the difference between a comfortable retirement and a few more years of work.

Whatever you do, you should still pay careful attention to your investments. We no longer live in a "buy and hold" world.

Stocks Suffer Worst Drop in More than Eight Months

Stocks end sharply lower, shedding up to 3% in some cases, and pushing the Dow Jones Industrial Average below 10,000 for the first time since November, though at final settle it stood at 10,002. The 270-point Dow drop is its worst showing in some nine months. Investors were reacting to European debt worries and concern the global recovery may suffer as a result. Commodities fell as the dollar gained against the euro.

Global markets tumbled on concerns about debt levels in Greece, Spain and Portugal. The euro hit a seven-month low against the dollar.

Domestically, the Labor Department triggered selling when it said unemployment claims rose 8,000 to a seasonally adjusted 480,000 last week. Economists had predicted claims would drop to 460,000. It was the fourth increase in the past five weeks, boosting claims to their highest level in two months.

The figures also raised questions about Friday's government report on jobs. It is expected to show employers added a small number of jobs but that the unemployment rate edged up to 10.1% from 10%, according to reports.

On the plus side, the Labor Department recorded a continuing increase in productivity, up by a seasonally adjusted 6.2% in Q4. Analysts had expected a 6% increase, as firms try to do more with fewer workers.

Mining and materials shares tumbled. Worries over the debt struggles of euro-zone countries Greece, Portugal and Spain fueled a flight from stocks to the safe-haven dollar, which hurt commodity prices denominated in the greenback, Reuters said

Faber Says S&P 500 May Drop 20% on Economic, Earnings Prospects

The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index may retreat 20 percent from a 15-month high because stocks are expensive given prospects for economic and profit growth, Marc Faber said.

The benchmark index for U.S. stocks, which closed at 1,150.23 on Jan. 19, may fall to 920, said Faber, 63, who recommended buying stocks in March, before the biggest rally since the Great Depression. The index surged 70 percent from a 12-year low in March before dropping 5.1 percent to 1,092.17 through yesterday. The S&P 500’s price-earnings ratio had jumped to 25, the highest since 2002, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

“The market has become overbought,” Faber, who publishes the Gloom, Boom and Doom report, said in a phone interview from Switzerland. “There isn’t a meaningful improvement in the economy taking place. The economy may disappoint somewhat in the next few months. The statistics that are being published are very questionable. The economy has stabilized, but isn’t really expanding.”

Consumer spending, which accounts for about 70 percent of the economy, probably increased at a 1.8 percent annual rate in the fourth quarter after rising at a 2.8 percent pace in the previous three months, economists said before a Jan. 29 report from the Commerce Department. The jobless rate held at 10 percent in December, near a 26-year high, the Labor Department said on Jan. 8.

Not That Great

“With unemployment staying at a relatively high level and with the revenue side being weak, I don’t think that corporate profits will be that great in 2010,” Faber said. “Basically, the profits have been boosted by aggressive cost-cutting. The revenue side of corporations is weak.”

A record nine-quarter profit slump for S&P 500 companies is projected to have ended in the fourth quarter with a 73 percent increase in earnings. Sales at the 122 S&P 500 companies that have reported results for the period since Jan. 11 have increased 13 percent, Bloomberg data show.

Faber, who advised investors to buy U.S. stocks on March 9, when the S&P 500 reached its lowest level since 1996, said the gauge may end the year lower than the close on Dec. 31. The index rose 23 percent in 2009, ending the year at 1,115.10. “This year, investors will never achieve returns as high as in 2009,” he said. “Stocks are relatively high compared to the fundamentals.”

Financials, Commodities

While Faber said he cannot predict which industries will be the laggards, he highlighted weakness among financial and commodity-related companies. “Financials have already been quite weak,” Faber said. “It’s kind of a warning sign for the market. They may weaken further, especially the banks. Also commodities-related stocks could weaken somewhat as commodity prices ease.”

The S&P 500 Financials Index rallied 146 percent from a 17- year low in March before dropping 5.2 percent last week as President Barack Obama called for limiting the size and trading activities of financial institutions as a way to reduce risk- taking and prevent another financial crisis. Measures of energy and raw-materials and energy shares in the S&P 500 have retreated more than 1.5 percent in 2010.

Faber correctly predicted in May 2005 that stocks would make little headway that year. The S&P 500 gained 3 percent. He was less prescient in March 2007, when he said the S&P 500 was more likely to fall than rise because the threats of faster inflation and slower growth persisted. The S&P 500 climbed 10 percent between then and its record of 1,565.15 seven months later.

In his interview this week, Faber said that the S&P 500 may rise as high as 1,250 or 1,300 this year before declining again.

“Usually March, April are seasonally strong months,” he said. “We’ll get a rebound. In general, high-quality and large market capitalization stocks are reasonably priced considering you have zero interest-rates. As these markets go down, the high-quality, large-market-cap stocks will go down less than the smaller-cap stocks.”

--Editors: Nick Baker, Michael Regan